The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of midwives' counseling of pregnant women in fear of childbirth
Open accessAbstract
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 10–17. © Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003 Background. The aim of this clinical evaluation was to study birth experience, post‐traumatic stress symptoms, and satisfaction with care in new mothers who had consulted specially trained midwives because of a fear of childbirth during pregnancy. Methods. Sixty‐two women were eligible for the study, of whom 53 (85%) participated at 1–14 months postpartum. For comparison, a group of 53 women were matched for parity and mode of delivery. All 106 women completed two self‐rating scales, the Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire (W‐DEQ) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES), and answered several open questions about their opinion of the antenatal preparation given. Results. Those women who had been treated for fear of childbirth reported a rather more frightening experience of delivery, and more frequent symptoms of post‐traumatic stress related to delivery than did the women in the comparison group. Nevertheless, satisfaction with care was manifest in the study group. Conclusions. Women who seek help for fear of childbirth are a vulnerable group. Because the counseling received by the women in this study did not accord them the same positive experience of childbirth as the average parturient at the unit, more effective forms of treatment may be necessary. However, as most of the women were very satisfied with their care and with the outcome, one may assume that the care given had improved their situation to some degree.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Although guidelines exist [49], the content of SC and the time set aside for it differ between hospitals [28,50].”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [50]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,666
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813
InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
Flinders, D. J. (1997) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)89858-8 · Cited by 7,236
Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth.
Wijma, K., Wijma, B., & Zar, M. (1998) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.3109/01674829809048501 · Cited by 811
Sosa, R., Kennell, J. H., Klaus, M. H., Robertson, S., & Urrutia, J. J. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198009113031101 · Cited by 447
Posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth: A cross sectional study
Wijma, K., Söderquist, J., & Wijma, B. E. (1997) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0887-6185(97)00041-8 · Cited by 418
Prevalence and predictors of post‐traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth
Czarnocka, J., & Slade, P. (2000) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466500163095 · Cited by 384
Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section
Ryding, E. L., Wijma, B. E., Wijma, K., & Rydhström, H. (1998) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770512.x · Cited by 265
Self-citationPsychosocial characteristics of women and their partners fearing vaginal childbirth
Saisto, T., Salmela‐Aro, K., Nurmi, J., & Halmesmäki, E. (2001) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00122.x · Cited by 232
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Guirgis RR, 1997, Women's choice is a major reason for the. increase in the numbers of cesarean sections performed in recent years, Acta Obstet Gynceol Scand, 76, 9
- Aresko‐Wijma B, 1985, Research in psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology
- NordstrOm‐ErlandssonB.Risk and resilience during the neonatal period.Dissertation.Department of Psychology University of Goteborg 1996.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis
Grekin, R., & O’Hara, M. W. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.05.003 · Cited by 716
Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review
Dencker, A., Nilsson, C., Begley, C., Jangsten, E., Mollberg, M., Patel, H., Wigert, H., Hessman, E., Sjöblom, H., & Sparud-Lundin, C. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004 · Cited by 438
Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review
Nilsson, C., Hessman, E., Sjöblom, H., Dencker, A., Jangsten, E., Mollberg, M., Patel, H., Sparud‐Lundin, C., Wigert, H., & Begley, C. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7 · Cited by 424
Nieminen, K., Stephansson, O., & Ryding, E. L. (2009) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340902998436 · Cited by 373
Self-citationAlcorn, K. L., O’Donovan, A., Patrick, J., Creedy, D. K., & Devilly, G. J. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709992224 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryding, E. L., Persson, A., Onell, C., & Kvist, L.
- Affiliations
- Helsingborgs lasarett (SE)
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-17
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2144372147
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of the Sunshine Coast
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- fear of childbirth, midwife counseling, antenatal preparation, childbirth experience, posttraumatic stress symptoms, satisfaction with care, postpartum women, Impact of Event Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety, Counseling, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Fear, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Delivery, Obstetric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review