Flight altitude of trans‐Sahara migrants in autumn: a comparison of radar observations with predictions from meteorological conditions and water and energy balance models
Open accessAbstract
Radar observations on the altitude of bird migration and altitudinal profiles of meteorological conditions over the Sahara desert are presented for the autumn migratory period. Migratory birds fly at an average altitude of 1016 m (a.s.l.) during the day and 571 m during the night. Weather data served to calculate flight range using two models: an energy model (EM) and an energy‐and‐water model (EWM). The EM assumes that fuel supply limits flight range whereas the EWM assumes that both fuel and water may limit flight range. Flight ranges estimated with the EM were generally longer than those with the EWM. This indicates that trans‐Sahara migrants might have more problems balancing their water than their energy budget. However, if we assume fuel stores to consist of 70% instead of 100% fat (the remainder consisting of 9% protein and 21% water), predicted flight ranges of the EM and EWM largely overlap. Increased oxygen extraction, reduced flight costs, reduced exhaled air temperature, reduced cutaneous water loss and increased tolerance to water loss are potential physiological adaptations that would improve the water budget in migrants. Both the EM and EWM predict optimal flight altitudes in agreement with radar observations in autumn. Optimal flight altitudes are differently predicted by the EM and EWM for nocturnal spring migration. During spring, the EWM predicts moderately higher and the EM substantially higher flight altitudes than during autumn. EWM predictions are therefore in better agreement with radar observations on flight altitude of migrants over the Negev desert in spring than EM predictions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Benefits derived from wind assistance are likely to motivate migrants to a greater extent than thermoregulation or water balance.
“Instead, benefits derived from wind assistance are likely to motivate migrants to a greater extent (Liechti et al., 2000), although this depends on the importance attributed to maintaining water balance (Klaassen and Biebach, 2000).”
From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Klaassen and Biebach, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude
Altshuler, D. L. (2006) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icj008 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
- Authors
- Klaassen, M., & Biebach, H.
- Affiliations
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- ORCID
- Klaassen, Marcel
- Venue
- Journal of Avian Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-55
- ISSN
- 0908-8857 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-048X
- OpenAlex
- W1986897297
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Journal of Avian Biology (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- bird migration, flight altitude, trans-Saharan migration, autumn migration, radar observations, flight range, energy balance, water balance, physiological adaptation, nocturnal migration, spring migration, Sahara, Negev
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review