The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) evolved from the concept of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and has been used for reconstructing sites with bone deficiencies associated with dental implants. For GBR, the use of absorbable collagen membranes has been increasing, but, at present, scientific information on the use of collagen membranes for GBR is limited. This study was aimed to clinically and histomorphometrically compare two collagen membranes, Bio‐Gide® and BioMend Extend TM, for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects in eight mongrel dogs. Implant dehiscence defects were surgically created in edentulous ridges, followed by the placement of three endosseous implants bilaterally in the mandible. Each implant dehiscence defect was randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) control (no membrane), (2) porcine dermis collagen barrier (Bio‐Gide) or (3) bovine tendon collagen barrier (BioMend Extend). Dogs were sacrificed at 4 and 16 weeks (four dogs each) after treatment. Histomorphometric analysis included percentage linear bone fill (LF), new bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and area of new bone fill (BF). The results of the study revealed no significant differences among groups for any parameter at 4 weeks. However, at 16 weeks, more LF, BIC, and BF were noted in the membrane‐treated groups than controls. BioMend Extend‐treated defects demonstrated significantly greater BIC than control (P < 0.05) at this time point. BIC at 16 weeks was significantly greater than 4‐week BIC (P < 0.05). Membrane exposure occurred in 9 out of 15 sites examined, resulting in significantly less LF and BIC than the sites without membrane exposure (P < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that: (1) GBR treatment with collagen membranes may significantly enhance bone regeneration, manifested at late stage (16 weeks) of healing; and (2) space maintenance and membrane coverage were the two most important factors affecting GBR using bioabsorbable collagen membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“PASS” Principles for Predictable Bone Regeneration
Wang, H.-L., & Boyapati, L. (2006) · Implant Dentistry · doi:10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f · Cited by 686
Self-citationHorizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration
Benic, G. I., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2014) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12039 · Cited by 511
Biodegradation of differently cross‐linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat
Rothamel, D., Schwarz, F., Sager, M., Herten, M., Sculean, A., & Becker, J. (2005) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x · Cited by 408
Collagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient
Abou Neel, E. A., Bozec, L., Knowles, J. C., Syed, O., Mudera, V., Day, R., & Hyun, J. K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Oh, T., Meraw, S. J., Lee, E., Giannobile, W. V., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-90
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W2053493615
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x
- The paper
- Oh, T., Meraw, S. J., Lee, E., Giannobile, W. V., & Wang, H. (2003). Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.