The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity
Abstract
To examine the importance of management practices and landscape structure on diversity of butterflies 16 farms with organic or conventional management were censused during 1997 and 1998. On each farm a transect route was walked during July and the beginning of August, six times in 1997 and five times in 1998. The farms were located in the central part of Sweden in two adjacent regions with the same pool of species. The organic and conventional farms were paired with help of the Bray‐Curtis dissimilarity index according to land use to control for landscape structure on the farm level. On each farm calculations were made of large‐ and small‐scale landscape heterogeneity with the help of GIS. A grid with a mesh size of 400 m was placed over each farm and the small‐scale heterogeneity was calculated as the mean habitat diversity of four squares. The large‐scale landscape heterogeneity described the landscape in which the farms were imbedded, and covered an area of 5x5 km. No differences in butterfly diversity, number of species or number of observations were noted between organic and conventional farms. Butterfly diversity was positively correlated with small‐scale landscape heterogeneity while butterfly abundance was positively correlated with large‐scale heterogeneity. Both large‐scale and small‐scale heterogeneity were important for the composition of species. The landscape structure seemed to be more important for butterfly diversity and species composition than the farming system in itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A., & Wilson, J. D. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00011-9 · Cited by 3,205
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M. C., Schwager, M., & Jeltsch, F. (2004) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x · Cited by 2,575
The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta‐analysis
BENGTSSON, J., AHNSTRÖM, J., & WEIBULL, A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x · Cited by 1,751
Self-citationDoes organic farming benefit biodiversity?
Hole, D. G., Perkins, A. J., Wilson, J. D., Alexander, I. H., Grice, P. V., & Evans, A. D. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018 · Cited by 1,597
How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
Kleijn, D., & Sutherland, W. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x · Cited by 1,519
Metadata
- Authors
- Weibull, A.-C., Bengtsson, J., & Nohlgren, E.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 743-750
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W2117754859
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230611.x
- The paper
- Weibull, A.-C., Bengtsson, J., & Nohlgren, E. (2000). Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230611.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.