The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands
Open accessAbstract
Confined within a volcanic caldera at 2000 m a.s.l., the sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands, harbors a distinct biota. At this altitude the climate is harsh and the growing season short. Hence, plant and animal communities, constituting the sub‐alpine plant–flower‐visitor network, are clearly delimited, both spatially and temporally. We investigated species composition and interaction structure of this system. A total of 11 plant species (91% endemics) and 37 flower‐visiting animal species (62% endemics) formed 108 interactions. Numbers of interactions among species varied ten‐fold within both plant and animal communities. Generalization level of a species was positively correlated with its local abundance. Two separate network analyses revealed a significantly nested structure. In relation to a plant–flower‐visitor system, nestedness implies that specialized species (animals or plants) interact with a subset of the species pool visiting (animals) or being visited (plants) by more generalized species. Therefore, specialized, locally rare plants tend to be visited by generalized, locally abundant animals, and specialized, locally rare animals tend to utilize generalized, locally abundant food plants. Such patterns could have implications for conservation of the sub‐alpine network, and stress the importance of preserving not only rare species, but also the more abundant ones, which may be key food resources or pollinators in the plant–flower‐visitor network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Cited by
The modularity of pollination networks
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., & Jordano, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104 · Cited by 2,639
Self-citationAlmeida‐Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, P. R., Loyola, R. D., & Ulrich, W. (2008) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16644.x · Cited by 1,757
A consumer's guide to nestedness analysis
Ulrich, W., Almeida‐Neto, M., & Gotelli, N. J. (2009) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17053.x · Cited by 830
Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks
Vázquez, D. P., Melián, C. J., Williams, N. M., Blüthgen, N., Krasnov, B. R., & Poulin, R. (2007) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15828.x · Cited by 666
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Dupont, Y. L., Hansen, D. M., & Olesen, J. M.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-13
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-310
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W2034608167
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03443.x
- The paper
- Dupont, Y. L., Hansen, D. M., & Olesen, J. M. (2003). Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03443.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.