The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation‐induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship
Open accessAbstract
A technique based on progressive fumigation was used to reduce soil microbial biodiversity, and the effects of such reductions upon the stability of key soil processes were measured. Mineral soil samples from a grassland were fumigated with chloroform for up to 24 h and then incubated for 5 months to allow recolonisation by surviving organisms. The diversity of cultivable and non‐cultivable bacteria, protozoa and nematodes was progressively reduced by increasing fumigation times, as was the number of trophic groups, phyla within trophic groups, and taxa within phyla. Total microbial biomass was similar within fumigated soils, but lower than for unfumigated soil. There was no direct relationship between biodiversity and function. Some broad‐scale functional parameters increased as biodiversity decreased, e.g. thymidine incorporation, growth on added nutrients, and the decomposition rate of plant residues. Other more specific parameters decreased as biodiversity decreased, e.g. nitrification, denitrification and methane oxidation. Thus specific functional parameters may be a more sensitive indicator of environmental change than general parameters. Although fumigation reduced soil microbial biodiversity, there was evidence to suggest that it selected for organisms with particular physiological characteristics. The consequences of this for interpreting biodiversity – function relationships are discussed. The stability of the resulting communities to perturbation was further examined by imposing a transient (brief heating to 40°C) or a persistent (addition of CuSO 4 ) stress. Decomposition of grass residues was determined on three occasions after such perturbations. The soils clearly demonstrated resilience to the transient stress; decomposition rates were initially depressed by the stress and recovered over time. Resilience was reduced in the soils with decreasing biodiversity. Soils were not resilient to the persistent stress, there was no recovery in decomposition rate over time, but the soils with the highest biodiversity were more resistant to the stress than soils with impaired biodiversity. The study of functional stability under applied perturbation is a powerful means of examining the effects of biodiversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems
Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H., & Woodfin, R. M. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368734a0 · Cited by 1,786
Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability.
Naeem, S., & Li, S. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37348 · Cited by 1,438
Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M., & Morin, P. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36561 · Cited by 720
The influence of island area on ecosystem properties
Wardle, D. A., Zackrisson, O., Hörnberg, G., & Gallet, C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1296 · Cited by 641
Cited by
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320054111 · Cited by 2,550
Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932 · Cited by 1,674
Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen
van Elsas, J. D., Chiurazzi, M., Mallon, C. A., Elhottovā, D., Krištůfek, V., & Salles, J. F. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109326109 · Cited by 1,051
Lloret, F., Keeling, E. G., & Sala, A. (2011) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19372.x · Cited by 1,049
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, B. S., Ritz, K., Bardgett, R. D., Cook, R., Christensen, S., Ekelund, F., Sørensen, S. J., Bååth, E., Bloem, J., De Ruiter, P. C., Dolfing, J., & Nicolardot, B.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-294
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2102800131
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 29.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation‐induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900208.x
- The paper
- Griffiths, B. S., Ritz, K., Bardgett, R. D., Cook, R., Christensen, S., Ekelund, F., Sørensen, S. J., Bååth, E., Bloem, J., De Ruiter, P. C., Dolfing, J., & Nicolardot, B. (2000). Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation‐induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900208.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.