Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance

Johst, Karin, Brandl, Roland, Eber, Sabine·2002·Oikos

Abstract

Species associated with transient habitats need efficient dispersal strategies to ensure their regional survival. Using a spatially explicit metapopulation model, we studied the effect of the dispersal range on the persistence of a metapopulation as a function of the local population and landscape dynamics (including habitat patch destruction and subsequent regeneration). Our results show that the impact of the dispersal range depends on both the local population and patch growth. This is due to interactions between dispersal and the dynamics of patches and populations via the number of potential dispersers. In general, long‐range dispersal had a positive effect on persistence in a dynamic landscape compared to short‐range dispersal. Long‐range dispersal increases the number of couplings between the patches and thus the colonisation of regenerated patches. However, long‐range dispersal lost its advantage for long‐term persistence when the number of potential dispersers was low due to small population growth rates and/or small patch growth rates. Its advantage also disappeared with complex local population dynamics and in a landscape with clumped patch distribution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980208.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1003 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/364229a0 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2269 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/5781 · DOI
  5. 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0277:ECACDI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90032-O · DOI
  7. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0437 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1296 · DOI
  9. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0256 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/5741 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90031-N · DOI
  12. 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50014-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1333 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/2404976 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/5591 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50007-9 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/3546736 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1134 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/35008063 · DOI
  20. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0888 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0069 · DOI
  22. 10.1086/286143 · DOI
  23. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880108.x · DOI
  24. 10.2307/3545624 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0004 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00112-9 · DOI
  27. Johst K., 1999, Natal versus breeding dispersal: evolution in a model system, Evol. Ecol. Res., 1, 911
  28. 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1322 · DOI
  29. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0756 · DOI
  30. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00430.x · DOI
  31. 10.1086/303407 · DOI
  32. 10.1086/285580 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2503:MDEOHQ]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1020 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/3546850 · DOI
  36. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0856 · DOI
  37. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900109.x · DOI
  38. 10.1086/303341 · DOI
  39. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0259 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/5945 · DOI
  41. 10.1086/285966 · DOI
  42. 10.1086/285998 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johst, K., Brandl, R., & Eber, S.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
263-270
ISSN
  • 0030-1299
  • 1600-0706
Cited by
238
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review