The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance
Abstract
Species associated with transient habitats need efficient dispersal strategies to ensure their regional survival. Using a spatially explicit metapopulation model, we studied the effect of the dispersal range on the persistence of a metapopulation as a function of the local population and landscape dynamics (including habitat patch destruction and subsequent regeneration). Our results show that the impact of the dispersal range depends on both the local population and patch growth. This is due to interactions between dispersal and the dynamics of patches and populations via the number of potential dispersers. In general, long‐range dispersal had a positive effect on persistence in a dynamic landscape compared to short‐range dispersal. Long‐range dispersal increases the number of couplings between the patches and thus the colonisation of regenerated patches. However, long‐range dispersal lost its advantage for long‐term persistence when the number of potential dispersers was low due to small population growth rates and/or small patch growth rates. Its advantage also disappeared with complex local population dynamics and in a landscape with clumped patch distribution.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biotic movements of genes, individuals, or populations through a network of forest patches may be critical for the maintenance of ecological and evolutionary processes across multiple spatial and temporal scales.
“Biotic movements of genes, individuals, or populations through a network of forest patches may be critical for the maintenance of ecological and evolutionary processes across multiple spatial and temporal scales”
From Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity (2014) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1003 · DOI
- 10.1038/364229a0 · DOI
- 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2269 · DOI
- 10.2307/5781 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0277:ECACDI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90032-O · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1998.0437 · DOI
- 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1296 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1998.0256 · DOI
- 10.2307/5741 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90031-N · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50014-6 · DOI
- 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1333 · DOI
- 10.2307/2404976 · DOI
- 10.2307/5591 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50007-9 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546736 · DOI
- 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1134 · DOI
- 10.1038/35008063 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1999.0888 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1997.0069 · DOI
- 10.1086/286143 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880108.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3545624 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1997.0004 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00112-9 · DOI
- Johst K., 1999, Natal versus breeding dispersal: evolution in a model system, Evol. Ecol. Res., 1, 911
- 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1322 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1999.0756 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00430.x · DOI
- 10.1086/303407 · DOI
- 10.1086/285580 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2503:MDEOHQ]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1020 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546850 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1999.0856 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900109.x · DOI
- 10.1086/303341 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1998.0259 · DOI
- 10.2307/5945 · DOI
- 10.1086/285966 · DOI
- 10.1086/285998 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Johst, K., Brandl, R., & Eber, S.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-270
- ISSN
- 0030-1299
- 1600-0706
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review