The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using pattern‐oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application
Abstract
We suggest that the conscious use of information that is “hidden” in distinct structures in nature itself and in data extracted from nature (=pattern) during the process of modeling (=pattern‐oriented modeling) can substantially improve models in ecological application and conservation. Observed patterns, such as time‐series patterns and spatial patterns of presence/absence in habitat patches, contain a great deal of data on scales, site‐history, parameters and processes. Use of these data provides criteria for aggregating the biological information in the model, relates the model explicitly to the relevant scales of the system, facilitates the use of helpful techniques of indirect parameter estimation with independent data, and helps detect underlying ecological processes. Additionally, pattern‐oriented models produce comparative predictions that can be tested in the field. We developed a step‐by‐step protocol for pattern‐oriented modeling and illustrate the potential of this protocol by discussing three pattern‐oriented population models: (1) a population viability analysis for brown bears ( Ursus arctos ) in northern Spain using time‐series data on females with cubs of the year to adjust unknown model parameters; (2) a savanna model for detecting underlying ecological processes from spatial patterns of tree distribution; and (3) the incidence function model of metapopulation dynamics as an example of process integration and model generalization. We conclude that using the pattern‐oriented approach to its full potential will require a major paradigm shift in the strategies of modeling and data collection, and we argue that more emphasis must be placed on observing and documenting relevant patterns in addition to attempts to obtain direct estimates of model parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387
Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community
Ellner, S. P., McCauley, E., Kendall, B. E., Briggs, C. J., Hosseini, P. R., Wood, S. N., Janssen, A., Sabelis, M. W., Turchin, P., Nisbet, R. M., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35087580 · Cited by 208
Cited by
P LANT-I NSECT I NTERACTIONS IN F RAGMENTED L ANDSCAPES
Tscharntke, T., & Brandl, R. (2004) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123339 · Cited by 559
Mueller, T., & Fagan, W. F. (2008) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16291.x · Cited by 399
Statistical inference for stochastic simulation models - theory and application
Hartig, F., Calabrese, J. M., Reineking, B., Wiegand, T., & Huth, A. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01640.x · Cited by 384
Self-citationThe role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management
McLane, A. J., Semeniuk, C., McDermid, G. J., & Marceau, D. J. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.020 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiegand, T., Jeltsch, F., Hanski, I., & Grimm, V.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-222
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2136204467
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using pattern‐oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12027.x
- The paper
- Wiegand, T., Jeltsch, F., Hanski, I., & Grimm, V. (2003). Using pattern‐oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12027.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.