Cited by 58Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Drosophila Amphiphysin is a Post‐Synaptic Protein Required for Normal Locomotion but Not Endocytosis

A. Leventis, Peter, M. Chow, Brenda, Stewart, Bryan A., Iyengar, Balaji, Campos, Ana Regina, Boulianne, Gabrielle L.·2001·Traffic

Abstract

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is required to recycle synaptic vesicles for fast and efficient neurotransmission. Amphiphysins are thought to be multiprotein adaptors that may contribute to this process by bringing together many of the proteins required for endocytosis. Their in vivo function, however, has yet to be determined. Here, we show that the Drosophila genome encodes a single amphiphysin gene that is broadly expressed during development. We also show that, unlike its vertebrate counterparts, Drosophila Amphiphysin is enriched postsynaptically at the larval neuromuscular junction. To determine the role of Drosophila Amphiphysin, we also generated null mutants which are viable but give rise to larvae and adults with pronounced locomotory defects. Surprisingly, the locomotory defects cannot be accounted for by alterations in the morphology or physiology of the neuromuscular junction. Moreover, using stimulus protocols designed to test endocytosis under moderate and extreme vesicle cycling, we could not detect any defect in the neuromuscular junction of the amphiphysin mutant. Taken together, our findings suggest that Amphiphysin is not required for viability, nor is it absolutely required for clathrin-mediated endocytosis. However, Drosophila Amphiphysin function is required in both larvae and adults for normal locomotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.21113.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 58

Authors
A. Leventis, P., M. Chow, B., Stewart, B. A., Iyengar, B., Campos, A. R., & Boulianne, G. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Boulianne, Gabrielle L.
Venue
Traffic
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-11
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
839-850
ISSN
  • 1398-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0854
OpenAlex
W2134159136
Cited by
58
References
45
Citations by year
2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Traffic (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Health Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
amphiphysin, Drosophila, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, synaptic vesicle recycling, neuromuscular junction, locomotion, knockout mutants, postsynaptic proteins, neurotransmission
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Drosophila, Endocytosis, Immunohistochemistry, Larva, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuromuscular Junction, Synapses, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review