The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hassles with Taking Out the Garbage: Aggravating Aggresomes
Abstract
Diverse human diseases ranging from amyloidosis to neurodegenerative diseases are now recognized as ‘conformational diseases’ caused by protein misfolding and protein aggregation. Misfolded and aggregated proteins are usually handled in the cell through chaperone‐mediated refolding, or when that is impossible, destroyed by proteasomal degradation. Recent evidence suggests that cells might have evolved a third pathway that involves the sequestration of aggregated proteins into specialized ‘holding stations’ called aggresomes. The aggresomal pathway provides a mechanism by which aggregated proteins form particulate (∼ 200 nm) mini‐aggregates that are transported on microtubules (MTs) towards the MT organizing center (MTOC) by a process mediated by the minus‐end motor protein dynein. Once at the MTOC, the individual particles pack into a single, usually spherical aggresome (1–3 μm) that surrounds the MTOC. Aggresomes are dynamic: they recruit various chaperones and proteasomes, presumably to aid in the disposal of the aggregated proteins. In addition, the formation of an aggresome is likely to activate the autophagic clearance mechanism that terminates in lysosomal degradation. Hence, the aggresome pathway may provide a novel system to deliver aggregated proteins from the cytoplasm to lysosomes for degradation. Although it is clear that many pathological states correlate with the formation of aggresomes, their causal relationships remain hotly debated. Here, we describe the current state of our knowledge of the aggresome pathway and outline the open questions that provide the focus of current research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aggresomes: A Cellular Response to Misfolded Proteins
Johnston, J. A., Ward, C. L., & Kopito, R. R. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.143.7.1883 · Cited by 2,148
Zimmerman, S. B., & Trach, S. O. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90499-v · Cited by 1,337
Implications of macromolecular crowding for protein assembly
Minton, A. P. (2000) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(99)00045-7 · Cited by 649
Proteasome Inhibitors Activate Stress Kinases and Induce Hsp72
Meriin, A. B., Gabai, V. L., Yaglom, J., Shifrin, V. I., & Sherman, M. Y. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.11.6373 · Cited by 300 · cited 1×
“Indeed, recent results indicate that the sequestration of aggregated proteins into a single aggresome is actively promoted by cellular signaling mechanisms (40).”
Background
Cited by
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy
Vives-Bauza, C., Zhou, C., Huang, Y., Cui, M., de Vries, R. L. A., Kim, J., May, J., Tocilescu, M. A., Liu, W., Ko, H. S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911187107 · Cited by 1,616
Kawaguchi, Y., Kovacs, J. J., McLaurin, A., Vance, J. M., Ito, A., & Yao, T.-P. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00939-5 · Cited by 1,524
Watts, G. D. J., Wymer, J., Kovach, M. J., Mehta, S. G., Mumm, S., Darvish, D., Pestronk, A., Whyte, M. P., & Kimonis, V. E. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1332 · Cited by 1,391
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia‐Mata, R., Gao, Y., & Sztul, E.
- Venue
- Traffic
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 388-396
- ISSN
- 1398-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0854
- OpenAlex
- W2009125409
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hassles with Taking Out the Garbage: Aggravating Aggresomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30602.x
- The paper
- Garcia‐Mata, R., Gao, Y., & Sztul, E. (2002). Hassles with Taking Out the Garbage: Aggravating Aggresomes. Traffic. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30602.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.