Models of helping and coping.

Abstract

Draws a distinction between attribution of responsibility for a problem and attribution of responsibility for a solution. Four general helping models are derived. In the "moral" model, actors are held responsible for both problems and solutions and are believed to need only proper motivation. In the compensatory model, people are responsible only for solutions and are believed to need power. Individuals in the medical model are responsible for neither problems nor solutions and are thought to need treatment. In the enlightenment model, actors are responsible for problems but are unable or unwilling to provide solutions; they need discipline. It is maintained that each set of assumptions has characteristic consequences for the competence, status, and well-being of actors and that the wrong choice of model in a situation will undermine effective helping and coping. Competing models of responsibility in education, psychotherapy, law, and welfare are described, and research on attribution of responsibility is recommended as a way of addressing problems of both theoretical and social significance. (128 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Cites (95)

1. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
   Rotter, Julian B. · 1966 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
2. Social Theory and Social Structure
   Ross, Eva J., Merton, Robert K. · 1958 · The American Catholic Sociological Review
3. Untitled work
   1951
4. The structure of coping
   Pearlin, Leonard I., Schooler, Carmi · 1978 · Journal of Health and Social Behavior
5. Social support as a moderator of life stress
   Cobb, Sidney · 1976 · Psychosomatic Medicine
6. Staff Burn-Out
   Freudenberger, Herbert J. · 1974 · Journal of Social Issues
7. Normative Influences on Altruism
   Schwartz, Shalom H. · 1977 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
8. Untitled work
   1962 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
9. Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change
   Kelman, Herbert C. · 1958 · Journal of Conflict Resolution
10. Beyond Freedom and Dignity.
    Boguslaw, Robert, Skinner, B. F. · 1972 · Contemporary Sociology

Show all 95 references

Cited by (20)

1. Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives.
   Maruna, Shadd · 2001
2. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
   Crocker, Jennifer, Major, Brenda · 1989 · Psychological Review
3. Stigma among health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders and its consequences for healthcare delivery: Systematic review
   van Boekel, Leonieke C., Brouwers, Evelien P.M., van Weeghel, Jaap, Garretsen, Henk F.L. · 2013 · Drug and Alcohol Dependence
4. An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas
   Weiner, Bernard, Perry, Raymond P., Magnusson, Jamie · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: Implications for the well-being of people of color.
   Harrell, Shelly P. · 2000 · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

See all 914