The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature.

Christensen-Szalanski, Jay J., Beach, Lee R.·1984·American Psychologist
DOI 10.1037//0003-066x.39.1.75

Cites (1)

  1. Fads, fashions, and folderol in psychology
    Dunnette, Marvin D. · 1966 · American Psychologist

Show all 1 references

Cited by (9)

  1. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
    Bornmann, Lutz, Daniel, Hans‐Dieter · 2008 · Journal of Documentation
  2. The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management
    Pierce, Jason R., Aguinis, Herman · 2013 · Journal of Management
  3. Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis
    HAIGH, MICHAEL S., LIST, JOHN A. · 2005 · The Journal of Finance
  4. Publication and related biases.
    Song, Eastwood, Gilbody, Duley, Sutton · 2000 · Health Technology Assessment
  5. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
    LEIMU, R, KORICHEVA, J · 2005 · Trends in Ecology & Evolution

See all 190

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.39.1.75
The paper
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., & Beach, L. R. (1984). The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.39.1.75

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.