How are we doing in soft psychology?

Rosenthal, Robert·1990·American Psychologist
DOI 10.1037//0003-066x.45.6.775

Cites (1)

  1. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
    Smith, Mary L., Glass, Gene V. · 1977 · American Psychologist

Show all 1 references

Cited by (40)

  1. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
    Ferguson, Christopher J. · 2009 · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
  2. Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense
    Funder, David C., Ozer, Daniel J. · 2019 · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  3. Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment
    De Wolff, Marianne S, van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H · 1997 · Child Development
  4. Evidence-based practice in psychology.
    American Psychological Association · 2006 · American Psychologist
  5. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results
    Ellis, Paul D. · 2010

See all 515

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How are we doing in soft psychology? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.45.6.775
The paper
Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology? American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.45.6.775

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.