Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection.

David Michael Buss·1995·American Psychologist

Abstract

Men and women clearly differ in some psychological domains. A. H. Eagly (1995) shows that these differences are not artifactual or unstable. Ideally, the next scientific step is to develop a cogent explanatory framework for understanding why the sexes differ in some psychological domains and not in others and for generating accurate predictions about sex differences as yet undiscovered. This article offers a brief outline of an explanatory framework for psychological sex differences--one that is anchored in the new theoretical paradigm of evolutionary psychology. Men and women differ, in this view, in domains in which they have faced different adaptive problems over human evolutionary history. In all other domains, the sexes are predicted to be psychologically similar. Evolutionary psychology jettisons the false dichotomy between biology and environment and provides a powerful metatheory of why sex differences exist, where they exist, and in what contexts they are expressed (D. M. Buss, 1995).

Cites (5)

  1. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
    Buss, David M. · 1989 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
    Buss, David M., Schmitt, David P. · 1993 · Psychological Review
  3. Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology
    Buss, David M., Larsen, Randy J., Westen, Drew, Semmelroth, Jennifer · 1992 · Psychological Science
  4. Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science
    Buss, David M. · 1995 · Psychological Inquiry
  5. Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis.
    Oliver, Mary Beth, Hyde, Janet Shibley · 1993 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 5 references

Cited by (32)

  1. Toward a Psychology of Human Agency
    Bandura, Albert · 2006 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  2. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings.
    Costa, Paul T., Terracciano, Antonio, McCrae, Robert R. · 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.
    Bussey, Kay, Bandura, Albert · 1999 · Psychological Review
  4. Genes, evolution, and personality
    Bouchard, Thomas J., Loehlin, John C. · 2001 · Behavior Genetics
  5. The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives
    Allen, Nicholas B., Badcock, Paul B. T. · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 581

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.50.3.164
The paper
Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.50.3.164

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.