Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations.

Philip C. Rodkin, Thomas W. Farmer, Ruth Pearl, Richard M. Van Acker·2000·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This study examined subtypes of popular 4th-6th grade boys (N = 452). Popular-prosocial (model) and popular-antisocial (tough) configurations were identified by means of teacher ratings and compared with peer and self-assessments and social centrality measures. Peers perceived model boys as cool, athletic, leaders, cooperative, studious, not shy, and nonaggressive. Peers perceived tough boys as cool, athletic, and antisocial. Model boys saw themselves as nonaggressive and academically competent. Tough boys saw themselves as popular, aggressive, and physically competent. Tough boys were disproportionately African American, particularly when African Americans were a minority in their classrooms. Model and tough boys were overrepresented at nuclear social centrality levels. These findings suggest that highly aggressive boys can be among the most popular and socially connected children in elementary classrooms.

Cites (66)

  1. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function
    Ward, Joe H. · 1963 · Journal of the American Statistical Association
  2. A Handbook of Child Psychology
    1932 · Nature
  3. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
    Steele, Claude M. · 1997 · American Psychologist
  4. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation
    Jenkins, John G., Allport, Gordon W. · 1938 · The American Journal of Psychology
  5. Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups
    Rubin, Kenneth H., Bukowski, William M., Parker, Jeffrey G. · 2007 · Handbook of Child Psychology
  6. Cluster analysis
    Mark S. Aldenderfer · 1984
  7. Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.
    Coie, John D., Dodge, Kenneth A., Coppotelli, Heide · 1982 · Developmental Psychology
  8. Peer Rejection in Childhood.
    Studer, Marlena M., Asher, Steven R., Coie, John D. · 1991 · Contemporary Sociology
  9. Cluster Analysis
    Aldenderfer, Mark, Blashfield, Roger · 1984 · Sage eBooks
  10. Readings in Social Psychology.
    Greenwood, Ernest, Newcomb, Theodore M., Hartley, Eugene L. · 1948 · American Sociological Review

Show all 66 references

Cited by (35)

  1. School readiness and later achievement.
    Duncan, Greg J., Dowsett, Chantelle J., Claessens, Amy, Magnuson, Katherine, Huston, Aletha C., Klebanov, Pamela, Pagani, Linda S., Feinstein, Leon, Engel, Mimi, Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne et al. · 2007 · Developmental Psychology
  2. Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups
    Rubin, Kenneth H., Bukowski, William M., Parker, Jeffrey G. · 2007 · Handbook of Child Psychology
  3. Adolescent Development
    Steinberg, Laurence, Morris, Amanda Sheffield · 2001 · Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Bullying and the peer group: A review
    Salmivalli, Christina · 2010 · Aggression and Violent Behavior
  5. Adolescent Development in Interpersonal and Societal Contexts
    Smetana, Judith G., Campione-Barr, Nicole, Metzger, Aaron · 2006 · Annual Review of Psychology

See all 758

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14
The paper
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. M. V. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.