Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women.
Abstract
Examined the accuracy with which rape and lesser sexual assaults were predicted among a representative national sample of 2,723 college women. A total of 14 risk variables operationalized three vulnerability hypotheses: (a) vulnerability-creating traumatic experiences, (b) social-psychological vulnerability, and (c) vulnerability-enhancing situations. Each hypothesis was tested individually, and a composite model was developed via discriminant analysis. Only the traumatic experiences variables clearly improved over the base rates in identifying rape victims, but risk variables from each vulnerability hypothesis met criteria for inclusion in the composite model. A risk profile emerged that characterized only 10% of the women, but among them the risk of rape was twice the rate of women without the profile. The concept of traumatic sexualization was used to explain this finding. However, the vast majority of sexually victimized women (75-91%) could not be differentiated from nonvictims.
Cites (5)
- The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education studentsKoss, Mary P., Gidycz, Christine A., Wisniewski, Nadine · 1987 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A conceptualization.Finkelhor, David, Browne, Angela · 1985 · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.Koss, Mary P., Oros, Cheryl J. · 1982 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivationKanin, Eugene J. · 1985 · Archives of Sexual Behavior
- Methodological considerations in research on the prevalence of child sexual abuseWyatt, Gail Elizabeth, Peters, Stefanie Doyle · 1986 · Child Abuse & Neglect
Cited by (23)
- Violence Against Women: An Integrated, Ecological FrameworkHEISE, LORI L. · 1998 · Violence Against Women
- Rape Myths: In ReviewLonsway, Kimberly A., Fitzgerald, Louise F. · 1994 · Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Sexual Revictimization: A Review of the Empirical LiteratureClassen, Catherine C., Palesh, Oxana Gronskaya, Aggarwal, Rashi · 2005 · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blamingGrubb, Amy, Turner, Emily · 2012 · Aggression and Violent Behavior
- No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community.Koss, Mary P., Goodman, Lisa A., Browne, Angela, Fitzgerald, Louise F., Keita, Gwendolyn Puryear, Russo, Nancy Felipe · 1994
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-006x.57.2.242
- The paper
- Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.57.2.242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.