Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance.
Abstract
Normative comparisons are a procedure for evaluating the clinical significance of therapeutic interventions. This procedure, consisting of comparing data on treated individuals with that of normative individuals, is described, and a step-by-step statistical methodology for conducting normative comparisons in the context of treatment-outcome research is presented. Four examples of the methodology are outlined in detail. Attention is paid to potential theoretical, statistical, and methodological challenges to the implementation of normative comparisons, as well as to the advantages of normative comparisons in providing evidence for the beneficial gains of treatment.
Cites (23)
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersWilliams, Janet B. W., First, Michael · 2013 · Encyclopedia of Social Work
- Cognitive Therapy for Depression: (675542012-001)2012 · PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.Jacobson, Neil S., Truax, Paula · 1991 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior ChangeGarfield, S. L., Bergin, A. E., Dryden, Windy · 1987 · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCooper, Theodore · 1976 · Military Medicine
- MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoringStarke R. Hathaway, J. McKinley · 1989 · University of Minnesota Press eBooks
- Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and CovarianceGlass, Gene V, Peckham, Percy D., Sanders, James R. · 1972 · Review of Educational Research
- Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an automatic thoughts questionnaireHollon, Steven D., Kendall, Philip C. · 1980 · Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Inquiries into human faculty and its development.Galton, Francis · 1919 · Dent eBooks
- Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology2003 · Choice Reviews Online
Cited by (64)
- Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.Teasdale, John D., Segal, Zindel V., Williams, J. Mark G., Ridgeway, Valerie A., Soulsby, Judith M., Lau, Mark A. · 2000 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- A Multidimensional Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy for PTSDBradley, Rebekah, Greene, Jamelle, Russ, Eric, Dutra, Lissa, Westen, Drew · 2005 · American Journal of Psychiatry
- Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data.Cumming, Geoff, Finch, Sue · 2005 · American Psychologist
- The Empirical Status of Empirically Supported Psychotherapies: Assumptions, Findings, and Reporting in Controlled Clinical Trials.Westen, Drew, Novotny, Catherine M., Thompson-Brenner, Heather · 2004 · Psychological Bulletin
- Quality-of-Life Impairment in Depressive and Anxiety DisordersRapaport, Mark Hyman, Clary, Cathryn, Fayyad, Rana, Endicott, Jean · 2005 · American Journal of Psychiatry
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-006x.67.3.285
- The paper
- Kendall, P. C., Marrs, A. L., Nath, S. R., & Sheldrick, R. C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.3.285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.