Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses: Reliability and validity of operationalizing DSM--IV criteria into a self-report format.

Mintz, Laurie B., O'Halloran, M. Sean, Mulholland, Amy M., Schneider, Paxton A.·1997·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

The Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses (Q-EDD) operationalizes eating disorder criteria of the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and differentiates (a) between those with and without an eating disorder diagnosis, (b) among eating-disordered, symptomatic, and asymptomatic individuals, and (c) between those with anorexia and bulimia diagnoses. Three studies examined the Q-EDD's psychometric properties. Convergent validity was supported by correspondence between Q-EDD diagnoses and established inventory scores. Criterion validity was supported by high correspondence between Q-EDD and interview or clinician diagnoses. Incremental validity was supported by greater accuracy of Q-EDD diagnoses than those yielded by an established inventory. Test-retest reliability and interscorer agreement were very good. Future use is discussed.

Cites (2)

  1. Studies of the epidemiology of bulimia nervosa
    1990 · American Journal of Psychiatry
  2. High interrater reliability for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I (SCID-I)
    Skre, I., Onstad, S., Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E. · 1991 · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Show all 2 references

Cited by (6)

  1. Self-Determination Theory and Diminished Functioning: The Role of Interpersonal Control and Psychological Need Thwarting
    Bartholomew, Kimberley J., Ntoumanis, Nikos, Ryan, Richard M., Bosch, Jos A., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie · 2011 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  2. The Eating Attitudes Test: Validation With DSM-IV Eating Disorder Criteria
    Mintz, Laurie B., O'Halloran, M. Sean · 2000 · Journal of Personality Assessment
  3. Intuitive eating is associated with interoceptive sensitivity. Effects on body mass index
    Herbert, Beate M., Blechert, Jens, Hautzinger, Martin, Matthias, Ellen, Herbert, Cornelia · 2013 · Appetite
  4. Emotional Appetite Questionnaire. Construct validity and relationship with BMI
    Nolan, Laurence J., Halperin, Lindsay B., Geliebter, Allan · 2010 · Appetite
  5. Does therapeutic writing help people with long-term conditions? Systematic review, realist synthesis and economic considerations
    Nyssen, Olga P, Taylor, Stephanie JC, Wong, Geoff, Steed, Elizabeth, Bourke, Liam, Lord, Joanne, Ross, Carol A, Hayman, Sheila, Field, Victoria, Higgins, Ailish et al. · 2016 · Health Technology Assessment

See all 259

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses: Reliability and validity of operationalizing DSM--IV criteria into a self-report format. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0167.44.1.63
The paper
Mintz, L. B., O'Halloran, M. S., Mulholland, A. M., & Schneider, P. A. (1997). Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses: Reliability and validity of operationalizing DSM--IV criteria into a self-report format. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.44.1.63

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.