Record keeping in two types of relationships.
Abstract
On the basis of a distinction between communal and exchange relationships (Clark & Mills, 1979; Mills & Clark, 1982), the following predictions were made: (a) Members of exchange relationships would keep track of individual inputs into joint tasks and (b) members of communal relationships would not. These hypotheses were tested in three studies. In each study, subjects worked on a task with a partner with whom they (a) desired or had a communal relationship or (b) desired or had an exchange relationship. The task involved locating and circling number sequences in a large matrix. Whether subjects used a pen of the same or of a different color from that used by their partner served as the dependent measure. If partners worked with pens of the same color individual inputs wee obscured. If they worked with different color pens, individual inputs were clear. Given this, if the proportion of subjects in a condition choosing different color pens was greater than 50% (chance), it was taken as evidence that subjects in that condition were trying to keep track of individual inputs. If this proportion was less than 50%, it was taken as evidence that subjects were trying to avoid keeping track of individual inputs. As predicted, in all three studies the proportion of subjects in the exchange conditions who chose a different color pen was significantly greater than 50% and was significantly greater than the proportion of subjects in the communal conditions who chose a different color pen. Also as expected, in no study was this percentage greater than 50% in he communal conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cites (1)
- Self-Definition: The Impact of the Relative Performance and Similarity of OthersTesser, Abraham, Campbell, Jennifer · 1980 · Social Psychology Quarterly
Cited by (16)
- The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Baumeister, Roy F., Leary, Mark R. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
- Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in OrganizationsMcAllister, D. J. · 1995 · Academy of Management Journal
- The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.Fiske, Alan P. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Guilt: An interpersonal approachBaumeister, Roy F., Stillwell, Arlene M., Heatherton, Todd F. · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
- Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor.Kraus, Michael W., Piff, Paul K., Mendoza-Denton, Rodolfo, Rheinschmidt, Michelle L., Keltner, Dacher · 2012 · Psychological Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Record keeping in two types of relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.47.3.549
- The paper
- Clark, M. S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.47.3.549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.