Preferences for separating or combining events.

Abstract

This research investigates people's preferences for temporally separating or combining emotionally impactful events. For instance, do people prefer to experience 2 negative events (e.g., manuscript rejections) on the same day or on different days? Do people prefer to experience 2 positive events (e.g., manuscript acceptances) on the same or different days? This article proposes a renewable resources model that combines elements of decision-making models (prospect theory) with the notion that people possess limited but renewable physiological, cognitive, and social resources for dealing with emotionally impactful events. As predicted, Ss preferred to separate 2 positive events (the gain-savoring hypothesis), to separate 2 negative events (the multiple-loss-avoidance hypothesis), and to combine a positive and a negative event (the loss-buffering hypothesis). Ss displayed identical preferences for events from the academic, financial, and social domains.

Cites (1)

1. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1981 · Science

Show all 1 references

Cited by (11)

1. The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
   Gross, James J. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
2. Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life
   Peterson, Christopher, Park, Nansook, Seligman, Martin E. P. · 2005 · Journal of Happiness Studies
3. Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
   Fredrickson, Barbara L., Kahneman, Daniel · 1993 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being.
   Lyubomirsky, Sonja · 2001 · American Psychologist
5. Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling
   Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Hunter, Jeremy · 2003 · Journal of Happiness Studies

See all 330