The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has strong psychometric properties and reliability, with Cronbach alpha scores at or around .90.”
From Mindfulness for the self-management of negative coping, rumination and fears of compassion in people with cancer: An exploratory study (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Rumination has been found to predict MDD onset in young adults (Nolen‐Hoeksema, Parker, & Larson, 1994); increased levels of depression (Nolen‐Hoeksema, 2000); and transition to chronic, relapsing depression (Wiersma et al., 2010).”
From A mindful yoga intervention for young women with major depressive disorder: Design and baseline sample characteristics of a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as Nolen‐Hoeksema, Parker, & Larson, 1994
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 · Cited by 12,910
TARGET ARTICLE: "Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence"
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01 · Cited by 7,154
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x · Cited by 5,172
“Sometimes distraction is negatively correlated with depression and rumination (Bagby & Parker, 2001; Chang, 2004; Lam et al., 2003; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1994), some-times it is positively correlated (Schmaling et al., 2002), and sometimes it is uncorrelated (Abela et al., 2002; Arnow et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis.
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1023910315561 · Cited by 3,808
“According to Response Styles Theory (RST; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1987), it is characterized by self-reflection (Morrow & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1990) as well as a repetitive and passive focus on one’s negative emotions (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991, 2000; Nolen-Hoeksema, Larson, & Grayson, 1999; Nolen-Hoeksema, Parker, & Larson, 1994 ).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationMischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889
Metadata
- Authors
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-104
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4295812738
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- rumination, coping, depressive mood, bereavement, loss, grief
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.92
- The paper
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994). Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.92