The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.
Abstract
Human differentiation on the basis of gender is a fundamental phenomenon that affects virtually every aspect of people's daily lives. This article presents the social cognitive theory of gender role development and functioning. It specifies how gender conceptions are constructed from the complex mix of experiences and how they operate in concert with motivational and self-regulatory mechanisms to guide gender-linked conduct throughout the life course. The theory integrates psychological and sociostructural determinants within a unified conceptual structure. In this theoretical perspective, gender conceptions and roles are the product of a broad network of social influences operating interdependently in a variety of societal subsystems. Human evolution provides bodily structures and biological potentialities that permit a range of possibilities rather than dictate a fixed type of gender differentiation. People contribute to their self-development and bring about social changes that define and structure gender relationships through their agentic actions within the interrelated systems of influence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 404 · Cited by 2,476
Metadata
- Authors
- Bussey, K., & Bandura, A.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Bussey, Kay
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 676-713
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2068860288
- Cited by
- 2,476
- References
- 404
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 141 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 93
- FWCI
- 78.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- gender development, gender differentiation, social cognitive theory, gender roles, gender concepts, self-regulation, motivation, life course, social influence, biological potential, gender relations, social change
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review