On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.

Yantis, Steven, Johnston, James C.·1990·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Early and late selection models of attention disagree about whether visual objects are identified before or after selection, with recent evidence of interference from to-be-ignored stimuli favoring late selection over early selection accounts. However, these tests may not have permitted optimal attentional focusing. In 4 experiments subjects identified an attentionally cued target letter embedded among distractors. Only minimal effects of information appearing in to-be-ignored locations were observed. This striking efficiency of selection provides support for early selection theories and calls into question some late selection theories holding that stimuli throughout the display are immediately and fully identified prior to attentional selection. In order to explain the larger pattern of results across a variety of focused- and divided-attention paradigms, a hybrid model is advanced with a flexible locus for visual selection.

Cites (59)

  1. Orienting of Attention
    Posner, Michael I. · 1980 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  2. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
    Shiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
  3. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
    Eriksen, Barbara A., Eriksen, Charles W. · 1974 · Perception & Psychophysics
  4. Attention and Effort
    Egeth, Howard, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · The American Journal of Psychology
  5. Perception and Communication
    2016 · Interpersonal Communication
  6. The information available in brief visual presentations
    Sperling, George · 1960 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  7. Attention and the detection of signals.
    Posner, Michael I., Snyder, Charles R., Davidson, Brian J. · 1980 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  8. Chronometric explorations of mind
    Michael I. Posner · 1978
  9. Attention and Performance IX
    Bergum, Bruce O., Long, John, Baddeley, Alan · 1982 · The American Journal of Psychology
  10. Interaction of information in word recognition.
    Morton, John · 1969 · Psychological Review

Show all 59 references

Cited by (18)

  1. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory
    Pashler, Harold · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control
    Lavie, Nilli, Hirst, Aleksandra, de Fockert, Jan W., Viding, Essi · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  3. Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection
    Theeuwes, Jan · 2010 · Acta Psychologica
  4. The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention
    de Fockert, Jan W., Rees, Geraint, Frith, Christopher D., Lavie, Nilli · 2001 · Science
  5. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention
    Lavie, Nilli, Tsal, Yehoshua · 1994 · Perception & Psychophysics

See all 391

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.135
The paper
Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.135

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.