On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.
Abstract
Early and late selection models of attention disagree about whether visual objects are identified before or after selection, with recent evidence of interference from to-be-ignored stimuli favoring late selection over early selection accounts. However, these tests may not have permitted optimal attentional focusing. In 4 experiments subjects identified an attentionally cued target letter embedded among distractors. Only minimal effects of information appearing in to-be-ignored locations were observed. This striking efficiency of selection provides support for early selection theories and calls into question some late selection theories holding that stimuli throughout the display are immediately and fully identified prior to attentional selection. In order to explain the larger pattern of results across a variety of focused- and divided-attention paradigms, a hybrid model is advanced with a flexible locus for visual selection.
Cites (59)
- Orienting of AttentionPosner, Michael I. · 1980 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theoryShiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch taskEriksen, Barbara A., Eriksen, Charles W. · 1974 · Perception & Psychophysics
- Attention and EffortEgeth, Howard, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · The American Journal of Psychology
- Perception and Communication2016 · Interpersonal Communication
- The information available in brief visual presentationsSperling, George · 1960 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
- Attention and the detection of signals.Posner, Michael I., Snyder, Charles R., Davidson, Brian J. · 1980 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Chronometric explorations of mindMichael I. Posner · 1978
- Attention and Performance IXBergum, Bruce O., Long, John, Baddeley, Alan · 1982 · The American Journal of Psychology
- Interaction of information in word recognition.Morton, John · 1969 · Psychological Review
Cited by (18)
- Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theoryPashler, Harold · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
- Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive ControlLavie, Nilli, Hirst, Aleksandra, de Fockert, Jan W., Viding, Essi · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selectionTheeuwes, Jan · 2010 · Acta Psychologica
- The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attentionde Fockert, Jan W., Rees, Geraint, Frith, Christopher D., Lavie, Nilli · 2001 · Science
- Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attentionLavie, Nilli, Tsal, Yehoshua · 1994 · Perception & Psychophysics
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.135
- The paper
- Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.