The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

McElree, Brian, Carrasco, Marisa·1999·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Feature and conjunction searches have been argued to delineate parallel and serial operations in visual processing. The authors evaluated this claim by examining the temporal dynamics of the detection of features and conjunctions. The 1st experiment used a reaction time (RT) task to replicate standard mean RT patterns and to examine the shapes of the RT distributions. The 2nd experiment used the response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure to measure discrimination (asymptotic detection accuracy) and detection speed (processing dynamics). Set size affected discrimination in both feature and conjunction searches but affected detection speed only in the latter. Fits of models to the SAT data that included a serial component overpredicted the magnitude of the observed dynamics differences. The authors concluded that both features and conjunctions are detected in parallel. Implications for the role of attention in visual processing are discussed.

Cites (6)

  1. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
    Schneider, Walter, Shiffrin, Richard M. · 1977 · Psychological Review
  2. The information available in brief visual presentations
    Sperling, George · 1960 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  3. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
    Jeremy M. Wolfe, Kyle R. Cave, Susan L. Franzel · 1989 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  4. Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis
    Crick, F · 1984 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  5. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
    Wickelgren, Wayne A. · 1977 · Acta Psychologica
  6. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.
    McClelland, James L. · 1979 · Psychological Review

Show all 6 references

Cited by (7)

  1. Working memory and focal attention.
    McElree, Brian · 2001 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  2. Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference
    Krajbich, Ian, Bartling, Björn, Hare, Todd, Fehr, Ernst · 2015 · Nature Communications
  3. Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing
    Carrasco, Marisa, McElree, Brian · 2001 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  4. Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence
    Anton-Erxleben, Katharina, Carrasco, Marisa · 2013 · Nature Reviews Neuroscience
  5. Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations
    Pestilli, Franco, Carrasco, Marisa · 2005 · Vision Research

See all 195

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1517
The paper
McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.