Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability.

Abstract

Blindfolded sighted, adventitiously blind, and congenitally blind subjects performed a set of navigation tasks. The more complex tasks involved spatial inference and included retracing a multisegment route in reverse, returning directly to an origin after being led over linear segments, and pointing to targets after locomotion. As a group, subjects responded systematically to route manipulations in the complex tasks, but performance was poor. Patterns of error and response latency are informative about the internal representation used; in particular, they do not support the hypothesis that only a representation of the origin of locomotion is maintained. The slight performance differences between groups varying in visual experience were neither large nor consistent across tasks. Results provide little indication that spatial competence strongly depends on prior visual experience.

Cited by (47)

1. Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery.
   Byrne, Patrick, Becker, Suzanna, Burgess, Neil · 2007 · Psychological Review
2. Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability
   Hegarty, M · 2002 · Intelligence
3. Path integration in mammals
   Etienne, Ariane S., Jeffery, Kathryn J. · 2004 · Hippocampus
4. Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections
   Klatzky, Roberta L. · 1998 · Lecture Notes in Computer Science
5. Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places☆
   ISHIKAWA, T, MONTELLO, D · 2006 · Cognitive Psychology

See all 704