Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to investigate the learning and memory processes involved in decision making under uncertainty. In two different experiments, subjects were given a choice between a certain alternative that produced a single known payoff and an uncertain alternative that produced a normal distribution of payoffs. Initially this distribution was unknown, and in the first experiment it was learned through feedback from past decisions, whereas in the second experiment it was learned by observing sample outcomes. In the first experiment, a response deadline was used to limit the amount of time available for making a decision. In the second experiment, an observation cost was used to limit the number of samples that could be purchased. The mean and variance of the uncertain alternative and the value of the certain alternative were factorially manipulated to study their joint effects on choice probability, choice response time (Experiment 1), and number of observations purchased (Experiment 2). Algebraic-deterministic theories developed for decision making with simple gambles fail to explain the present results. Two new models are developed and tested--fixed- and sequential-sampling models--that attempt to describe the learning and memory processes involved in decision making under uncertainty.
Cites (3)
- Elimination by aspects: A theory of choiceTversky, Amos · 1972 · Psychological Review
- The Theory of Stochastic ProcessesCox, D. R., Miller, H. D., Weiss, George, Shuler, Kurt · 1966 · Physics Today
- A Sequential Theory of Psychological DiscriminationLink, S. W., Heath, R. A. · 1975 · Psychometrika
Cited by (8)
- Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J. · 1988 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- The description–experience gap in risky choiceHertwig, Ralph, Erev, Ido · 2009 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processesSvenson, Ola · 1992 · Acta Psychologica
- A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from descriptionErev, Ido, Ert, Eyal, Roth, Alvin E., Haruvy, Ernan, Herzog, Stefan M., Hau, Robin, Hertwig, Ralph, Stewart, Terrence, West, Robert, Lebiere, Christian · 2010 · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
- Human Learning and MemoryJohnson, Marcia K., Hasher, Lynn · 1987 · Annual Review of Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538
- The paper
- Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.