Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.

Busemeyer, Jerome R.·1985·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the learning and memory processes involved in decision making under uncertainty. In two different experiments, subjects were given a choice between a certain alternative that produced a single known payoff and an uncertain alternative that produced a normal distribution of payoffs. Initially this distribution was unknown, and in the first experiment it was learned through feedback from past decisions, whereas in the second experiment it was learned by observing sample outcomes. In the first experiment, a response deadline was used to limit the amount of time available for making a decision. In the second experiment, an observation cost was used to limit the number of samples that could be purchased. The mean and variance of the uncertain alternative and the value of the certain alternative were factorially manipulated to study their joint effects on choice probability, choice response time (Experiment 1), and number of observations purchased (Experiment 2). Algebraic-deterministic theories developed for decision making with simple gambles fail to explain the present results. Two new models are developed and tested--fixed- and sequential-sampling models--that attempt to describe the learning and memory processes involved in decision making under uncertainty.

Cites (3)

  1. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
    Tversky, Amos · 1972 · Psychological Review
  2. The Theory of Stochastic Processes
    Cox, D. R., Miller, H. D., Weiss, George, Shuler, Kurt · 1966 · Physics Today
  3. A Sequential Theory of Psychological Discrimination
    Link, S. W., Heath, R. A. · 1975 · Psychometrika

Show all 3 references

Cited by (8)

  1. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.
    Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J. · 1988 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  2. The description–experience gap in risky choice
    Hertwig, Ralph, Erev, Ido · 2009 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  3. Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes
    Svenson, Ola · 1992 · Acta Psychologica
  4. A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description
    Erev, Ido, Ert, Eyal, Roth, Alvin E., Haruvy, Ernan, Herzog, Stefan M., Hau, Robin, Hertwig, Ralph, Stewart, Terrence, West, Robert, Lebiere, Christian · 2010 · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  5. Human Learning and Memory
    Johnson, Marcia K., Hasher, Lynn · 1987 · Annual Review of Psychology

See all 202

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538
The paper
Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.