Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall.
Abstract
Immediate serial recall and maximal speech rate were assessed for concrete and abstract words differing in length. Experiment 1 showed large advantages for spoken recall of concrete words that were independent of speech rate. Experiment 2 showed an equivalent effect with written, rather than spoken, recall. Experiment 3 showed that the concreteness effect was still present when recall was backward rather than forward. In all 3 experiments, concrete words enjoyed an advantage that was roughly constant across all serial positions (with the possible exception of the 1st and last items). Experiment 4 used a matching-span procedure and showed that when there was no requirement for linguistic output, the effect of concreteness (but not the effect of word length) was eliminated. It is argued that semantic coding exerts powerful effects in verbal short-term memory tasks that have generally been underestimated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract).
Cites (4)
- The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memoryPaulesu, E., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J. · 1993 · Nature
- Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory taskCohen, Jonathan D., Perlstein, William M., Braver, Todd S., Nystrom, Leigh E., Noll, Douglas C., Jonides, John, Smith, Edward E. · 1997 · Nature
- INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPANCONRAD, R., HULL, A. J. · 1964 · British Journal of Psychology
- STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypothesesZhang, Guojun, Simon, Herbert A. · 1985 · Memory & Cognition
Cited by (5)
- The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters.Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia, Vigliocco, Gabriella, Vinson, David P., Andrews, Mark, Del Campo, Elena · 2011 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Working memory retention systems: A state of activated long-term memoryRuchkin, Daniel S., Grafman, Jordan, Cameron, Katherine, Berndt, Rita S. · 2003 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case studyPollock, Lewis · 2018 · Behavior Research Methods
- Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memoryBireta, T. J., Fry, S. E., Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Surprenant, A. M., Tehan, G., Tolan, G. A. · 2010 · Memory & Cognition
- Concreteness and disagreement: Comment on Pollock (2018)Neath, Ian, Surprenant, Aimée M. · 2020 · Memory & Cognition
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.25.5.1256
- The paper
- Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.25.5.1256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.