Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors?

Grencavage, Lisa M., Norcross, John C.·1990·Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

There is little convergence or empirical research on factors shared by diverse psychotherapies. We reviewed 50 publications to discern commonalities among proposed therapeutic common factors. The number of factors per publication ranged from 1 to 20, with 89 different commonalities proposed in all. Analyses revealed that 41 % of proposed commonalities were change processes; by contrast, only 6% of articulated commonalities were client characteristics. The most consensual commonalities across categories were development of a therapeutic alliance, opportunity for catharsis, acquisition and practice of new behaviors, and clients' positive expectancies. The frequency of selected commonalities is presented and directions for future research are outlined. Mental health professionals have long observed that disparate forms of psychotherapy share common elements or core features (Goldfried & Newman, 1986; Thompson, 1987). As early as 1936, Rosenzweig, noting that all forms of psychotherapy have cures to their credit, invoked the famous Dodo Bird verdict from Alice in Wonderland, Everybody has won and all must have prizes, to characterize psychotherapy outcomes. He then proposed as a possible explanation therapeutic common factors, including psychological interpretation, catharsis, and the therapist's personality. In 1940, Watson reported the results of a meeting held to ascertain areas of agreement among psychotherapy systems (Sollod, 1981). The participants, including such diverse figures as Saul Rosenzweig, Alexandra Adler, Frederick Allen, and Carl Rogers, concurred that support, interpretation, insight, behavior change, a good therapeutic relationship, and certain therapist characteristics were common features of successful psychotherapy approaches (Watson, 1940).

Cites (2)

  1. Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy.
    Rosenzweig, Saul · 1936 · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
  2. The specificity versus nonspecificity dilemma: toward identifying therapeutic change agents
    1986 · American Journal of Psychiatry

Show all 2 references

Cited by (24)

  1. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
    Prochaska, James O., DiClemente, Carlo C., Norcross, John C. · 1992 · American Psychologist
  2. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice.
    Sue, Derald Wing, Capodilupo, Christina M., Torino, Gina C., Bucceri, Jennifer M., Holder, Aisha M. B., Nadal, Kevin L., Esquilin, Marta · 2007 · American Psychologist
  3. Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education
    Grossman, Pam, McDonald, Morva · 2008 · American Educational Research Journal
  4. Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome
    Greenberg, Roger P., Constantino, Michael J., Bruce, Noah · 2006 · Clinical Psychology Review
  5. Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance
    Koole, Sander L., Tschacher, Wolfgang · 2016 · Frontiers in Psychology

See all 529

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0735-7028.21.5.372
The paper
Grencavage, L. M., & Norcross, J. C. (1990). Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.21.5.372

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.