Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval.
Abstract
An experiment is reported that examines age-related differences in the lag effect and its relation to retention interval. A total of 30 young and 30 older adults received both once-presented pairs and twice-presented pairs that were tested in a continuous cued-recall paradigm either after a short retention interval (2 pairs intervening between the last presentation of a pair and its test) or a long retention interval (20 pairs intervening between the last presentation of a pair and its test). In addition, the twice-presented pairs were separated by either 0, 1, 4, 8, or 20 intervening pairs. The results replicated the interaction between retention interval and lag that has been reported by Glenberg (1976, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 1-16). Furthermore, although the older adults performed considerably lower than the younger adults in overall recall performance, their data were remarkably similar to the younger adults in the patterning of means. A mathematical modeling procedure was used to fit the data to Estes' stimulus fluctuation model. The results of this modeling procedure suggest that, compared with younger adults, older adults (a) encode less contextual information at a given point in time and (b) have a slower rate of contextual fluctuation across time.
Cites (2)
- Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regressionEstes, W. K. · 1955 · Psychological Review
- Effect of spacing presentations on retention of a paired associate over short intervals.Peterson, Lloyd R., Wampler, Richard, Kirkpatrick, Meredith, Saltzman, Dorothy · 1963 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
Cited by (15)
- Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational PsychologyDunlosky, John, Rawson, Katherine A., Marsh, Elizabeth J., Nathan, Mitchell J., Willingham, Daniel T. · 2013 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term RetentionRoediger, Henry L., Karpicke, Jeffrey D. · 2006 · Psychological Science
- Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.Cepeda, Nicholas J., Pashler, Harold, Vul, Edward, Wixted, John T., Rohrer, Doug · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin
- Learning Versus Performance: An Integrative ReviewSoderstrom, Nicholas C., Bjork, Robert A. · 2015 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal RetentionCepeda, Nicholas J., Vul, Edward, Rohrer, Doug, Wixted, John T., Pashler, Harold · 2008 · Psychological Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0882-7974.4.1.3
- The paper
- Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., & Paullin, R. (1989). Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. Psychology and Aging. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.4.1.3