Psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent.
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The megamodel holds that fields and domains begin, peak, and end at different times.
“(b) fields and domains begin, peak, and end at different points;”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Subotnik et al. 2018
The available passages list chapters and page numbers but do not discuss the megamodel or when fields and domains begin, peak, or end. Searches for the claim’s wording, developmental timing, and “megamodel” returned no relevant passage from the paper’s substantive text. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe megamodel holds that talent development is a long-term process extending beyond school into adulthood.
“( f ) talent development is a long-term endeavor, extending beyond the school years into adulthood.”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Subotnik et al. 2018
The available passages are a table of contents and a References listing; they do not state the megamodel’s position on how long talent development lasts. Searches for the school-years-to-adulthood claim and for a long-term talent-development process returned no substantive passage, so the claim cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe megamodel holds that abilities are malleable, especially domain-specific abilities.
“(a) abilities are malleable, particularly those specific to domains;”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Subotnik et al. 2018
The available passages are a table of contents and a references listing, not discussion of the megamodel. Searches for the claim and for “malleable” returned no passage addressing whether abilities, particularly domain-specific abilities, are malleable. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Paula Olszemki'Kubilius, FrankC. Worrell, Rena F. Subotnik, and Megan Foley-Nicpon IV. Performing Arts 237 Chapter 11. The Development of Acting Talent: Possibilities and Approaches 239
- Tony Noice and Helga Noice Gatekeeper Interview: David Black, Producer, Director, Actor, Teacher 257 Aaron Kozbelt Chapter 12. Talent Development in Dance: Perspectives From Gatekeepers in Hong Kong and Finland 261
- Joey С hua Gatekeeper Interview: Stephen Pier, Professor of Dance and Division Director, The Hartt School, University of Hartford 291 Aaron Kozbelt Chapter 13. Reflections on Talent Development in the Performing Arts: Concluding Comments 301
- Aaron Kozbelt V. Producing Arts 309 Chapter 14. Talent and Ability in Drawing and Visual Art 311
- Linda Janin Chapter 15. Culinary Arts: Talent and Their Development 345
- Laurent Aron, Marion Botella, and Todd Lubart Chapter 16. Reflections on Talent Development in Arts Production 361
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. C. 2. /. J.
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W3215012899
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Keywords
- high performance, human potential, talent development, expertise development, performance psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
