The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interpretation bias modification.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some end-users have criticized CBM programs for the duration of training, the content of training stimuli, and lack of customized features.
“Some end-users have criticized the duration of the training, the content of training stimuli, and lack of customized features, for instance (Beard et al., 2020).”
From Acceptability and Co-Development of an Online Cognitive Bias Modification Intervention for Emerging Adults With Hazardous Alcohol Use and Social Anxiety: A Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as Beard et al., 2020
IBM studies have been reported as acceptable with regard to perceived helpfulness, personal relevance, user-friendliness, credibility, ease of use, simplicity, and esthetic appearance.
“IBM studies in particular have been reported as acceptable with regard to their perceived helpfulness, personal relevance, userfriendliness, credibility, ease of use, simplicity, and esthetic appearance (Beard, 2011; Beard et al., 2020; Beard et al., 2019).”
From Acceptability and Co-Development of an Online Cognitive Bias Modification Intervention for Emerging Adults With Hazardous Alcohol Use and Social Anxiety: A Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as Beard et al., 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prior, K., Salemink, E., Wiers, R. W., Teachman, B. A., Piggott, M., Newton, N. C., Teesson, M., Baillie, A. J., Campbell, S., & Stapinski, L. A. (2020) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14452 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Beard, C., & Peckham, A. D.
- Venue
- Clinical handbook of fear and anxiety: Maintenance processes and treatment mechanisms.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 359-377
- OpenAlex
- W2974582262
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- interpretation bias modification, cognitive bias modification, interpretation bias, emotion regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
