Cited by 508Phenomenology and Existential PhilosophyQualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative Research Methods and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Smith, Jonathan A., Fieldsend, Megumi·2021·Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed.).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0000252-008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While reflexive practices were used to manage subjectivity, the findings remain a 'double hermeneutic' in which the researchers are attempting to make sense of the participants' own sense-making processes.

    “While we utilised reflexive practices to manage this subjectivity, the findings remains a ‘double hermeneutic’ in which the researchers are attempting to make sense of the participants’ own sense-making processes [54].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J. A., & Fieldsend, M.
Venue
Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed.).
Published
2021
Pages
147-166
OpenAlex
W4285525982
Cited by
508
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 181 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 16
FWCI
231.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
interpretative phenomenological analysis, qualitative research methodology, phenomenology, lived experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review