The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
“Career adaptability,”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Particularly during the period of digital educational transformation, the rapid pace of technological change may further amplify this conversion barrier, causing low-adaptability teachers to feel resource-depleted when pursuing their professional goals.
“the rapid pace of technological change may further amplify this conversion barrier, causing low-adaptability teachers to feel resource-depleted when pursuing their professional goals (Haenggli and Hirschi, 2023)”
From Teaching beliefs and wellbeing among primary school teachers: a moderated mediation of work engagement and career adaptability (2026) · cites this paper as Haenggli and Hirschi, 2023
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Haenggli, M., & Hirschi, A.
- Venue
- Career psychology: Models, concepts, and counseling for meaningful employment.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 213-233
- OpenAlex
- W4377082243
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Keywords
- career adaptability, career development, career change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
