Cited by 99Cognitive Abilities and TestingHistorical Economic and Social StudiesHuman Health and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Galton's data a century later.

Johnson, Ronald C., McClearn, Gerald E., Yuen, Sylvia, Nagoshi, Craig T., Ahern, Frank M., Cole, Robert E.·1985·American Psychologist

Abstract

A century ago, Francis Galton obtained data from thousands of individuals on a variety of sensory, psychomotor, and physical attributes. A sub- stantial portion of these data has remained unana- tyzed. In this article, we report on the reliability of the measures, developmental trends in mean scores, correlations of the measures with age, correlations among measures, occupational differences in scores, and sibling correlations. Test-retest correlations gen- erally were very substantial Growth continued some individuals, especially those from lower eco- nomic strata, until they were in their mid-2Os. De- velopmental trends during later childhood, adoles- cence, and early maturity were found to be similar to those described in contemporary developmental psychological literature, except that the tempo of development appears to have been slightly slower then than now. Persons from lower economic strata were smaller and weaker and showed less sensory efficiency. In addition, analyses of variance indicated that persons from lower economic strata continued their physical growth longer than persons from more advantaged environments. Sibling resemblances were substantial on most of the measures; opposite-sex siblings resembled one another less than did same- sex siblings. In 1884, Francis Galton established an anthropo- metric laboratory at the International Health Exhi- bition in South Kensington, London, for the mea- surement in various ways of Human Form and Faculty (quoted in Pear…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.40.8.875

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Francis Galton reported visual simple reaction time latencies below 190 ms in young subjects.

    “SRTs were first measured by Francis Galton in the 19th century, who reported visual SRT latencies below 190 ms in young subjects.”

    From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 1985

  • Delay-corrected SRT latencies were substantially shorter (213 and 220 ms in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively) than SRT latencies reported in other large-scale computer-based studies, but were similar to SRT latencies reported by Galton and contemporary researchers using non-computerized measures.

    “Delay-corrected SRT latencies were substantially shorter (213 and 220 ms in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively) than the SRT latencies reported in other large-scale computer-based studies, but were similar to the SRT latencies reported both by Galton (Johnson et al., 1985) and contemporary researchers using non-computerized measures (Eckner et al., 2011; Montare, 2013).”

    From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 1985

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, R. C., McClearn, G. E., Yuen, S., Nagoshi, C. T., Ahern, F. M., & Cole, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaii System (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1985
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
875-892
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2092711082
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Human Health and Disease
Keywords
Francis Galton, anthropometry, psychomotor skills, physical growth, developmental trends, socioeconomic status, occupational differences, sibling resemblance, test-retest reliability, Victoria and Albert Museum, history of psychology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anthropometry, Child, England, Female, Genetics, Growth, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Social Class, Visual Acuity, History, 19th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review