Not so anomalous observations question ESP in dreams.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No plausible mechanism for fraud has been put forward.
“Fraud has also been suggested as a possible explanation for the results (e.g., Clemmer, 1986), but no plausible mechanism for fraud has been put forward.”
From On the correspondence between dream content and target material under laboratory conditions: A meta-analysis of dream-ESP studies, 1966-2016 (2017) · cites this paper as Clemmer, 1986
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Clemmer, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Fort Wayne (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clemmer, Edward J.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1173-1174
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2147613185
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- extrasensory perception, dreams, anomalous experiences, dream content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
