The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chaos, self-organization, and psychology.
Abstract
A variety of investigators in recent years have proposed models of psychological systems based on the concepts of chaos, nonlinear dynamics, and self-organization. Unfortunately, psychologists in general have little understanding of these important ideas. These terms are defined, and their relationships are discussed. The value of applying these concepts to psychological systems is demonstrated by exploring their utility in areas ranging from neuroscience to clinical psychology. Some of the difficulties in using nonlinear concepts and methodologies in empirical investigations are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another reason to expect inconsistency in associations is the complex dynamic systems theory, which suggests that psychological processes are perpetually changing [46].”
From Using person-specific networks in psychotherapy: challenges, limitations, and how we could use them anyway (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relapse Prevention for Alcohol and Drug Problems: That Was Zen, This Is Tao
Witkiewitz, K., & Marlatt, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.4.224 · Cited by 880
Life Span Theory in Developmental Psychology
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0111 · Cited by 1,240
The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams
Losada, M. F., & Heaphy, E. D. (2004) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764203260208 · Cited by 530
Responsiveness in psychotherapy.
Stiles, W. B., Honos‐Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00166.x · Cited by 473
Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics
Dooley, K. J., & de Ven, A. H. V. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.358 · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, S.
- Affiliations
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barton, Scott
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1992788167
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 26.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- chaos theory, self-organization, nonlinear dynamics, psychological systems, clinical psychology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Psychophysiology, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review