Cited by 5Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPhilosophy and History of ScienceGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

“The genetic hypothesis”: It was not tested but it could have been

Reed, T. Edward·1997·American Psychologist

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.52.1.77

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indirect measures of ancestry such as self-reports, genealogical records, or physical features are not objective or reliable indices of ancestry and have substantial measurement error.

    “These measures do not constitute objective or reliable indices of ancestry.”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [27]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 2 · Cited by 5

Authors
Reed, T. E.
Corresponding author
Reed, T. Edward
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1997-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
77-78
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2019506900
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2019: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
genetic hypothesis, behavioral genetics, hypothesis testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review