Cited by 557Cognitive Abilities and TestingFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation.

Downey, Douglas B.·2001·American Psychologist

Abstract

The resource dilution model posits that parental resources are finite and that as the number of children in the family increases, the resources accrued by any one child necessarily decline. Siblings are competitors for parents' time, energy, and financial resources and so the fewer the better. Even one sibling is too many. The author describes the general elements of the dilution position and assesses its merits for explaining the effect of siblings on one component of the educational process--tests of intellectual development. The author identifies critical flaws in recent critiques of the dilution position and concludes that dilution continues to provide the most promising explanation for why children with few siblings score higher on tests of cognitive skills than children with many siblings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.56.6-7.497

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with more siblings tend to score worse on various intellectual measures.

    “First, larger size of sibling group appears to adversely impact children’s perceptions of the quality of parenting received (Kidwell, 1981) and children with more siblings tend to fare worse on a variety of intellectual measures (Downey, 2001).”

    From Sibling Separation and Placement Instability for Children in Foster Care (2022) · cites this paper as Downey, 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Downey, D. B.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Downey, Douglas B.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2001
Volume
56
Issue
6-7
Pages
497-504
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W4249444617
Cited by
557
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
number of siblings, intellectual development, resource dilution, family size, cognitive development, parental resources
MeSH terms
Achievement, Child, Child Development, Family Characteristics, Humans, Intelligence, Models, Psychological, Socioeconomic Factors, Causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review