Cited by 589Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Religiosity/spirituality and health: A critical review of the evidence for biological pathways.

Seeman, Teresa E., Dubin, Linda Fagan, Seeman, Melvin·2003·American Psychologist

Abstract

The authors review evidence regarding the biological processes that may link religiosity/spirituality to health. A growing body of observational evidence supports the hypothesis that links religiosity/spirituality to physiological processes. Although much of the earliest evidence came from cross-sectional studies with questionable generalizability and potential confounding, more recent research, with more representative samples and multivariate analysis, provides stronger evidence linking Judeo-Christian religious practices to blood pressure and immune function. The strongest evidence comes from randomized interventional trials reporting the beneficial physiological impact of meditation (primarily transcendental meditation). Overall, available evidence is generally consistent with the hypothesis that religiosity/spirituality is linked to health-related physiological processes--including cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and immune function--althogh more solid evidence is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.53

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large literature has demonstrated the stress-buffering effects of R/S on physiological processes such as reduced cardiovascular reactivity, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation, and inflammation, which may improve health outcomes.

    “A large literature has demonstrated the stress-buffering effects of R/S on physiological processes such as reduced cardiovascular reactivity, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation, and inflammation, which may improve health outcomes.19”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 589

Authors
Seeman, T. E., Dubin, L. F., & Seeman, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2003
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
53-63
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2145929041
Cited by
589
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 37
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-10415, AG-17264, P60AG010415)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, health, biological pathways, blood pressure, immune function, meditation, transcendental meditation, cardiovascular health, neuroendocrine function, religious practice, Judeo-Christian tradition
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Status, Humans, Religion and Medicine, Meditation, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review