Distress crying in neonates: Species and peer specificity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One-day-old babies are more likely to mimic crying when they hear a recording of another newborn crying than when they hear their own cries or an older infant crying.
“They found that one-day-old babies were more likely to mimic crying when they heard a recording of another newborn crying, than when they heard their own cries, or heard a much older infant crying.”
From Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion (2017) · cites this paper as Martin and Clark (1982)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 327
- Authors
- Martin, G. B., & Clark, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Armstrong Atlantic State University (US)
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-9
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2082021519
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 26.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- neonates, species specificity, infant crying, social interaction, cross-species comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
