The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visual perception of numerosity in infancy.
Abstract
Numerosity was defined as an invariant property of a collection of objects specifying its numerical size. Infants looked at displays of small numerosities that changed optic structure such that size was not tied to certain static or dynamic configurational properties of the display but remained constant across patterns of optic motion. The displayed figures moved continuously and at a constant speed. The trajectories were irregular and could produce occlusion of objects. The task used involved infant-controlled habituation of visual looking time. At age 5 months, 8 months, and 13 months, 44 infants were tested for the numerosities 2, 3, and 4 in three randomly ordered sessions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How Children Learn the Meanings of Words
Bloom, P. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001 · Cited by 1,922
Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications.
Geary, D. C. (1994) · doi:10.1037/10163-000 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Loosbroek, E., & Smitsman, A. W.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 916-922
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2065543087
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual perception of numerosity in infancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.911.b
- The paper
- Van Loosbroek, E., & Smitsman, A. W. (1990). Visual perception of numerosity in infancy. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.911.b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
