The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.
Abstract
Attachment theory is based on the joint work of John Bowlby (1907-1991) and Mary Salter Ainsworth (1913- ). Its developmental history begins in the 1930s, with Bowlby's growing interest in the link between maternal loss or deprivation and later personality development and with Ainsworth's interest in security theory. Although Bowlby's and Ainsworth's collaboration began in 1950, it entered its most creative phase much later, after Bowlby had formulated an initial blueprint of attachment theory, drawing on ethology, control systems theory, and psychoanalytic thinking, and after Ainsworth had visited Uganda, where she conducted the first empirical study of infantmother attachment patterns. This article summarizes Bowlby's and Ainsworth's separate and joint contributions to attachment theory but also touches on other theorists and researchers whose work influenced them or was influenced by them. The article then highlights some of the major new fronts along which attachment theory is currently advancing. The article ends with some speculations on the future potential of the theory. Attachment theory is the joint work of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth (Ainsworth & Bowlby, 1991). Drawing on concepts from ethology, cybernetics, information processing, developmental psychology, and psychoanalysis, John Bowlby formulated the basic tenets of the theory. He thereby revolutionized our thinking about a child's tie to the mother and its disruption through separation, deprivation, and bereavement. Mary Ainsworth's innovative methodology not only made it possible to test some of Bowlby's ideas empirically but also helped expand the theory itself and is responsible for some of the new directions it is now taking. Ainsworth contributed the concept of the attachment figure as a secure base from which an infant can explore the world. In addition, she formulated the concept of maternal sensitivity to infant signals and its role in the development of infant-mother attachment patterns. The ideas now guiding attachment theory have a long developmental history. Although Bowlby and Ainsworth worked independently of each other during their early careers, both were influenced by Freud and other psychoanalytic thinkers—directly in Bowlby's case, indirectly in Ainsworth's. In this article, I document the origins of ideas that later became central to attachment theory. I then discuss the subsequent period of theory building and consolidation. Finally, I review some of the new directions in which the theory is currently developing and speculate on its future potential. In taking this retrospective developmental approach to the origins of attachment theory, I am reminded of Freud's (1920/1955) remark:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446 · cited 2×
“…he acknowledges Riviere and Klein for grounding him in the object-relations approach to psychoanalysis, with its emphasis on early relationships and the pathogenic potential of loss (Bowlby, 1969, p. xvii), he had grave reservations about aspects of the Kleinian approach to child psychoanalysis.”
BackgroundPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Security in Infancy, Childhood, and Adulthood: A Move to the Level of Representation
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333827 · Cited by 4,567
Ainsworth, M. S. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.4.709 · Cited by 3,231
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1127388 · Cited by 1,764
(1985) · doi:10.2307/3333824 · Cited by 1,658
Self-citationObject relations, dependency, and attachment: a theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1127008 · Cited by 1,461
Waters, E., & Deane, K. E. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333826 · Cited by 1,144
The Development of Social Attachments in Infancy
Schaffer, H. R., & Emerson, P. E. (1964) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1165727 · Cited by 644 · cited 6×
“Once attached, locomotor infants are able to use the attachment figure as a secure base for exploration of the environment and as a safe haven to which to return for reassurance (Ainsworth, 1967; Schaffer & Emerson, 1964).”
BackgroundInfluentialGrossmann, K., Grossmann, K. E., Spangler, G., Suess, G., & Unzner, L. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333836 · Cited by 413
Cited by
The development of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment.
Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.3 · Cited by 1,382
Attachment and Autonomy During Adolescence
McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Stephenson, J. C., & Hare, A. L. (2009) · Handbook of Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001012 · Cited by 485
Trzebiński, J., Cabański, M., & Czarnecka, J. Z. (2020) · Journal of Loss and Trauma · doi:10.1080/15325024.2020.1765098 · Cited by 331
Emotional Dysregulation in Children and Adolescents With Psychiatric Disorders. A Narrative Review
Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., Möhler, E., Plener, P., & Popow, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628252 · Cited by 280
Prato-Previde, E., Custance, D. M., Spiezio, C., & Sabatini, F. (2003) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853903321671514 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Bretherton, I.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 759-775
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2145430036
- Cited by
- 1,946
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759
- The paper
- Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.