Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations.
Abstract
This study examined subtypes of popular 4th-6th grade boys (N = 452). Popular-prosocial (model) and popular-antisocial (tough) configurations were identified by means of teacher ratings and compared with peer and self-assessments and social centrality measures. Peers perceived model boys as cool, athletic, leaders, cooperative, studious, not shy, and nonaggressive. Peers perceived tough boys as cool, athletic, and antisocial. Model boys saw themselves as nonaggressive and academically competent. Tough boys saw themselves as popular, aggressive, and physically competent. Tough boys were disproportionately African American, particularly when African Americans were a minority in their classrooms. Model and tough boys were overrepresented at nuclear social centrality levels. These findings suggest that highly aggressive boys can be among the most popular and socially connected children in elementary classrooms.
Cites (66)
- Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective FunctionWard, Joe H. · 1963 · Journal of the American Statistical Association
- A Handbook of Child Psychology1932 · Nature
- A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performanceSteele, Claude M. · 1997 · American Psychologist
- Personality: A Psychological InterpretationJenkins, John G., Allport, Gordon W. · 1938 · The American Journal of Psychology
- Peer Interactions, Relationships, and GroupsRubin, Kenneth H., Bukowski, William M., Parker, Jeffrey G. · 2007 · Handbook of Child Psychology
- Cluster analysisMark S. Aldenderfer · 1984
- Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Coie, John D., Dodge, Kenneth A., Coppotelli, Heide · 1982 · Developmental Psychology
- Peer Rejection in Childhood.Studer, Marlena M., Asher, Steven R., Coie, John D. · 1991 · Contemporary Sociology
- Cluster AnalysisAldenderfer, Mark, Blashfield, Roger · 1984 · Sage eBooks
- Readings in Social Psychology.Greenwood, Ernest, Newcomb, Theodore M., Hartley, Eugene L. · 1948 · American Sociological Review
Cited by (35)
- School readiness and later achievement.Duncan, Greg J., Dowsett, Chantelle J., Claessens, Amy, Magnuson, Katherine, Huston, Aletha C., Klebanov, Pamela, Pagani, Linda S., Feinstein, Leon, Engel, Mimi, Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne et al. · 2007 · Developmental Psychology
- Peer Interactions, Relationships, and GroupsRubin, Kenneth H., Bukowski, William M., Parker, Jeffrey G. · 2007 · Handbook of Child Psychology
- Adolescent DevelopmentSteinberg, Laurence, Morris, Amanda Sheffield · 2001 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Bullying and the peer group: A reviewSalmivalli, Christina · 2010 · Aggression and Violent Behavior
- Adolescent Development in Interpersonal and Societal ContextsSmetana, Judith G., Campione-Barr, Nicole, Metzger, Aaron · 2006 · Annual Review of Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14
- The paper
- Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. M. V. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.