Social risk and protective factors for African American children's academic achievement and adjustment during the transition to middle school.
Abstract
The transition to middle school is often marked by decreased academic achievement and increased emotional stress, and African American children exposed to social risk may be especially vulnerable during this transition. To identify mediators and protective factors, the authors related severity and timing of risk exposure to academic achievement and adjustment between 4th and 6th grade in 74 African American children. Longitudinal analyses indicated that severity more than timing of risk exposure was negatively related to all outcomes and that language skills mediated the pathway from risk for most outcomes. Transition to middle school was related to lower math scores and to more externalizing problems when children experienced higher levels of social risk. Language skills and parenting served as protective factors, whereas expectations of racial discrimination was a vulnerability factor. Results imply that promoting parenting and, especially, language skills, and decreasing expectations of racial discrimination provide pathways to academic success for African American children during the transition from elementary to middle school, especially those exposed to adversity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings confirm previous research in different national contexts which highlighted that socioeconomic status had a negative impact on transition experiences.
“This confirms the findings of previous research in different national contexts which highlighted that the socioeconomic status had a negative impact on transition experiences (USA, Benner & Graham, 2009;Benner et al., 2017;Burchinal et al., 2008;Canada, Serbin et al., 2013).”
From Primary–secondary school transition experiences and factors associated with differences in these experiences: Analysis of the longitudinal Growing Up in Scotland dataset (2023) · cites this paper as Burchinal et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 203
- Authors
- Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Zeisel, S. A., & Rowley, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 286-292
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2005001959
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 59.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Keywords
- social risk, protective factors, African American children, academic performance, school adjustment, middle school transition, language skills, parenting, externalizing problems, mathematics achievement, mediators
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Black or African American, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Prejudice, Probability, Surveys and Questionnaires, Race Relations, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Parenting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review