Cited by 479Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Experimental evidence for differential susceptibility: dopamine D4 receptor polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR) moderates intervention effects on toddlers’ externalizing behavior in a randomized controlled trial

Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Pijlman, Femke T. A., Mesman, Judi, Juffer, Femmie·2008·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

In a randomized controlled trial we tested the role of genetic differences in explaining variability in intervention effects on child externalizing behavior. One hundred fifty-seven families with 1- to 3-year-old children screened for their relatively high levels of externalizing behavior participated in a study implementing Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD), with six 1.5-hr intervention sessions focusing on maternal sensitivity and discipline. A moderating role of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) exon III polymorphism was found: VIPP-SD proved to be effective in decreasing externalizing behavior in children with the DRD4 7-repeat allele, a polymorphism that is associated with motivational and reward mechanisms and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children. VIPP-SD effects were largest in children with the DRD4 7-repeat allele whose parents showed the largest increase in the use of positive discipline. The findings of this first experimental test of (measured) gene by (observed) environment interaction in human development indicate that children may be differentially susceptible to intervention effects depending on genetic differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.293

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 479

Authors
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Pijlman, F. T. A., Mesman, J., & Juffer, F.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
293-300
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2159418720
Cited by
479
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
FWCI
32.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (2200.0097)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
differential susceptibility, dopamine D4 receptor, gene-environment interaction, externalizing problems, toddlers, positive discipline, maternal sensitivity, parenting support, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Maternal Behavior, Parent-Child Relations, Polymorphism, Genetic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Case-Control Studies, Parenting, Treatment Outcome, Minisatellite Repeats, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Receptors, Dopamine D4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review