Experimental evidence for differential susceptibility: dopamine D4 receptor polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR) moderates intervention effects on toddlers’ externalizing behavior in a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
In a randomized controlled trial we tested the role of genetic differences in explaining variability in intervention effects on child externalizing behavior. One hundred fifty-seven families with 1- to 3-year-old children screened for their relatively high levels of externalizing behavior participated in a study implementing Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD), with six 1.5-hr intervention sessions focusing on maternal sensitivity and discipline. A moderating role of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) exon III polymorphism was found: VIPP-SD proved to be effective in decreasing externalizing behavior in children with the DRD4 7-repeat allele, a polymorphism that is associated with motivational and reward mechanisms and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children. VIPP-SD effects were largest in children with the DRD4 7-repeat allele whose parents showed the largest increase in the use of positive discipline. The findings of this first experimental test of (measured) gene by (observed) environment interaction in human development indicate that children may be differentially susceptible to intervention effects depending on genetic differences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children with the DRD4 7-repeat allele have a better treatment response to a psychosocial parenting intervention than children without the allele.
“and to have a better treatment response to a psychosocial parenting intervention (Bakermans-Kranenburg, van Ijzendoorn, Pijlman, Mesman, & Juffer, 2008).”
From The influences of environmental enrichment, cognitive enhancement, and physical exercise on brain development: Can we alter the developmental trajectory of ADHD? (2011) · cites this paper as Bakermans-Kranenburg, van Ijzendoorn, Pijlman, Mesman, & Juffer, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 479
- Authors
- Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Pijlman, F. T. A., Mesman, J., & Juffer, F.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 293-300
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2159418720
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 32.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (2200.0097)
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- differential susceptibility, dopamine D4 receptor, gene-environment interaction, externalizing problems, toddlers, positive discipline, maternal sensitivity, parenting support, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Maternal Behavior, Parent-Child Relations, Polymorphism, Genetic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Case-Control Studies, Parenting, Treatment Outcome, Minisatellite Repeats, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Receptors, Dopamine D4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review