First onset versus recurrence of depression: differential processes of psychosocial risk
Abstract
Differential risk factors for the onset of depression were prospectively examined in a community-based sample of adolescents (N = 1,709), some of whom had a history of major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 286) and some of whom did not (n = 1,423). From the theories of J. Teasdale (1983, 1988) and R. Post (1992) concerning the etiology of initial versus recurrent episodes of depression, the authors hypothesized that (a) dysphoric mood and dysfunctional thinking styles would be correlated more highly among those with a previous history of MDD than among those without a history of MDD; (b) dysphoric mood or symptoms and dysfunctional thinking would be a stronger predictor of onset of recurrent episodes (n = 43) than of first onsets (n = 70); and (c) major life stress would be a stronger predictor of first onsets of MDD than of recurrent episodes. The results provide support for the 3 hypotheses and suggest that distinct processes are involved in the onset of first and recurrent episodes of MDD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is compelling evidence that intervention in the early stage of depression may prevent the development of cognitive factors associated with recurrent episodes.
“There is compelling evidence that intervention in this early stage may prevent the development of cognitive factors associated with recurrent episodes (Kendler 2000; Lewinsohn 1999; Ma 2004).”
From Interventions for preventing relapse and recurrence of a depressive disorder in children and adolescents (2012) · cites this paper as Lewinsohn 1999
There is a high level of continuity between depressive disorders in childhood/adolescence and adulthood.
“This is especially important given the high level of continuity between depressive disorders in childhood/adolescence and adulthood (Harrington 1990; Lewinsohn 1999)”
From Interventions for preventing relapse and recurrence of a depressive disorder in children and adolescents (2012) · cites this paper as Lewinsohn 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 301
- Authors
- Lewinsohn, P. M., Allen, N. B., Seeley, J. R., & Gotlib, I. H.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483-489
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2090140559
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH040501, MH40501, MH 50522, R01MH050522)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- depression onset, depression recurrence, major depressive disorder, adolescents, psychosocial risk factors, dysphoric mood, life events, etiology of depression
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Thinking, Urban Population, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review