Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Missing Data Techniques for Structural Equation Modeling.

Allison, Paul D.·2003·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

As with other statistical methods, missing data often create major problems for the estimation of structural equation models (SEMs). Conventional methods such as listwise or pairwise deletion generally do a poor job of using all the available information. However, structural equation modelers are fortunate that many programs for estimating SEMs now have maximum likelihood methods for handling missing data in an optimal fashion. In addition to maximum likelihood, this article also discusses multiple imputation. This method has statistical properties that are almost as good as those for maximum likelihood and can be applied to a much wider array of models and estimation methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.545

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.2307/2282773 · DOI
  2. Allison, 1987, Estimation of linear models with incomplete data., 71
  3. Allison. 2000 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298656.003.0001
  4. Allison, 2001, Missing data.
  5. Arbuckle, 1996, Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data., 243
  6. Bollen. 1995 · DOI
  7. Cohen, 1983, Applied multiple regression and correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
  8. Curran. 1997 · doi:10.1177/0266242697152007
  9. Duncan. A comparison of model- and multiple imputation-based approaches to longitudinal analysis with partial missingness. 5 1 1998 · DOI
  10. Gilks, 1996, Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice.
  11. 10.2307/2283101 · doi:10.2307/2283101
  12. Haitovsky, 1968, Missing data in regression analysis., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 30, 67, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb01507.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/2291399 · DOI
  14. Kim, 1977, The treatment of missing data in multivariate analysis., Sociological Methods & Research, 6, 215, 10.1177/004912417700600206 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Li, 1991, Significance levels from repeated p-values and multiply imputed data., Statistica Sinica, 1, 65
  16. 10.2307/1391878 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/2290664 · doi:10.2307/2290664 · Paper page
  18. Little, 1987, Statistical analysis with missing data.
  19. Marini, 1979, Maximum likelihood estimation in panel studies with missing data., 314
  20. McLachlan, 1997, The EM algorithm and extensions.
  21. Raghunathan, 2001, A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models., Survey Methodology, 27, 85
  22. 10.2307/2335739 · doi:10.2307/2335739 · Paper page
  23. Rubin. 1978 · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1978.tb08084.x
  24. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3304_5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sinharay, 2001, The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data., Psychological Methods, 6, 317, 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.317 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.2307/2289457 · DOI
  27. Wothke, 2000, Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data., 1
  28. Yuan, 2000, Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data., 165

Cited by

See all 1,333

Metadata

Authors
Allison, P. D.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2003-11
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
545-557
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W1989984421
Cited by
1,333
References
7
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Missing Data Techniques for Structural Equation Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.545
The paper
Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing Data Techniques for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.545

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.