Cited by 250Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesProblem Solving Skills Development

Problem solving deteriorates following mood challenge in formerly depressed patients with a history of suicidal ideation

Williams, J. Mark G., Barnhofer, Thorsten, Crane, Catherine, Beck, A. T.·2005·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The authors divided 34 participants who had a history of depression into 2 groups, those having previous suicidal ideation or behavior (n=19) and those having no such symptoms (n=15), then compared the 2 groups with a group of participants who had no history of depression (n=22). Assessment of interpersonal problem-solving performance using the Means-Ends Problem-Solving (MEPS) task before and after a mood-induction procedure showed that only those formerly depressed people with a history of suicidal ideation shifted in MEPS performance, producing significantly less effective problem solutions following mood challenge, consistent with a differential activation account of vulnerability for recurrence of suicidal ideation and behavior. The deterioration in effectiveness following mood challenge was moderated by lack of specificity in autobiographical memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.114.3.421

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of mood on suicide ideation is in line with the differential activation hypothesis and has been demonstrated in numerous previous studies.

    “The e ff ect of mood on suicide ideation is in line with the di ff erential activation hypothesis and has also been demonstrated in numerous previous studies (Cha et al., 2018; Lau, Segal, & Williams, 2004; Williams, Barnhofer, Crane, & Beck, 2005).”

    From Exploring the psychology of suicidal ideation: a theory driven network analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as Williams, Barnhofer, Crane, & Beck, 2005

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 250

Authors
Williams, J. M. G., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., & Beck, A. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2005-08
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
421-431
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2130648992
Cited by
250
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
Keywords
problem solving, mood induction, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, social problem solving, depression recurrence, autobiographical memory specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attention, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Recurrence, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review