The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations.
Abstract
Male and female student interviewers, classified as either high, moderate, or low on physical attractiveness, evaluated 12 bogus job applicants for whom sex, physical attractiveness, and qualifications had been varied. A 2 X 3 X 2 X 3 X 2 analysis of variance was computed, with the first two variables (interviewer sex and attractiveness) constituting between-group factors, and the last three variables (applicant sex, attractiveness, and qualifications) constituting repeated measures factors. Regardless of interviewer sex and attractiveness, highly qualified applicants were preferred over poorly qualified applicants, male applicants were preferred over female applicants, and attractive candidates were preferred over unattractive candidates. Discrimination in employment decisions was attributed to sex-role and physical attractiveness stereotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033731 · Cited by 3,865
Cited by
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness
O’Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00145-8 · Cited by 898
Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024 · Cited by 804
Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.
Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.1.51 · Cited by 685
HOSODA, M., STONE‐ROMERO, E. F., & COATS, G. (2003) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 288-294
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2052164826
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.288
- The paper
- Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E. (1977). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
