The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For narrative recall, the meta-analytic Z was not statistically reliable (Zma = -1.17), average effect size d = -.20 (95% CI -.68 to +.28), with all effect generated by a single study (Clifford & Scott, 1978).
“The meta-analytic Z for narrative recall was not statistically reliable, Z ma = -1 . 17 .Average effect size was d = -.20 (95% CI : -.68 to +.28), all the effect be ing generated by a single study (Clifford & Scott, 1978).”
From A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory (2004) · cites this paper as Clifford & Scott, 1978
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review
Christianson, S.-Å. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284 · Cited by 1,174
A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory
Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x · Cited by 489
Voice identification by human listeners: On earwitness reliability.
Clifford, B. R. (1980) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01040628 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clifford, B. R., & Scott, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1978-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 352-359
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2000644246
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Keywords
- eyewitness testimony, individual differences, situational factors, memory accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
